HR software pricing: Horizontal System Price Index

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

7 of the 28 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 21 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 1 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in USD (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 113 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): the published price normalised to two units nobody publishes side by side - the true per-employee-per-month cost of an HR or payroll stack once the base fee is spread over a 5, 20 and 100 employee business, and the per-seat cost of a CRM at the same three sizes - showing the crossover where a base-fee-plus-per-person price beats a flat per-seat one, the share of vendors publishing at all, and the module stacking (each capability a separate subscription) that makes the advertised figure wrong; the vertical CRMs (law, accounting, automotive) are priced on the same two units so a practice can see what its industry premium actually is

113 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.